THE GAME. THE STORIES. THE WHY.
Independent football coverage●Our standards
EXPLOREPower rankingsLeague leadersTeam statsInjuriesOddsTransactionsShortsRivalriesRecordsTV scheduleBye weeksEVENTSSuper BowlPro BowlCombineDraftPlayoffsWeb StoriesALL FOOTBALL. ALL IN.
WEEK 5
Find your next read

Search whynfl

Go deeper on the game you love.

News

Three touchdowns weren’t enough for David Montgomery’s Texans debut

2 min read Comments
Share ↗
WhatsApp Facebook X
Saved articles

Your reading list is saved on this browser.

Your reaction

David Montgomery scored three touchdowns in Houston’s opening loss. Week 2 brought a 20–6 defeat and a failed fourth-and-inches chance.

w.
WhyNFL Sports DeskPublished Updated
WHYNFL briefingUpdated: Sep 19, 2026, 6:57 pm EDT.

whynfl’s attributed briefing and context. No on-scene reporting or independent medical assessment is claimed.

The result behind the highlights

David Montgomery scored three touchdowns in Houston’s 36–31 opening loss to Buffalo. He still wanted more from his performance and from the team’s result.

The useful comparison

His rushing line was 60 yards on 20 carries. That makes a good example of why touchdown production and rushing efficiency answer different questions: scoring chances can produce a big fantasy total even when most carries are modest gains.

How the next game actually unfolded

Houston’s Week 2 meeting with Cincinnati has since been played: the Bengals won 20–6 on September 20. Houston managed two field goals, 60 rushing yards as a team and five conversions on 17 third downs. The team rushing total is separate from Montgomery’s individual 60 yards in the opener.

One important possession ended on fourth-and-inches in the second quarter, when Dexter Lawrence stopped Montgomery for a one-yard loss. That was a specific failed scoring opportunity, not proof that every short-yardage play or every Montgomery carry had the same outcome.

Read the later Texans practice and personnel update for the Week 4 availability picture.

The why matters.

See something that needs a second look? Read our corrections policy.

Join the conversation

Use a name or stay anonymous. No account or email required. Comments are reviewed before appearing.

Up to 3,000 characters

No published comments yet. Start the conversation.