THE GAME. THE STORIES. THE WHY.
Independent football coverage●Our standards
EXPLOREPower rankingsLeague leadersTeam statsInjuriesTransactionsShortsRivalriesRecordsBye weeksEVENTSSuper BowlPro BowlCombineDraftPlayoffsWeb StoriesALL FOOTBALL. ALL IN.
WEEK 9
Find your next read

Search whynfl

Go deeper on the game you love.

News

Field Yates and Mel Kiper rank the 2027 draft by position: quarterback, receiver, edge, tight end and safety are deep, while tackle, interior line and running back are thin

5 min read Comments
Share ↗
WhatsApp Facebook X
Saved articles

Your reading list is saved on this browser.

Your reaction

Field Yates and Mel Kiper call quarterback, receiver, edge, tight end and safety the deep spots in the 2027 class and tackle, interior line and running back thin. We check Yates’ quarterback tiers against the 15-board consensus.

w.
WhyNFL Sports DeskPublished
Drew Mestemaker, wearing No. 11 for North Texas, drops back to pass at Rice Stadium in November 2025.
Drew Mestemaker (No. 11) drops back for North Texas at Rice in November 2025, before his move to Oklahoma State. Photo by 2C2K Photography, CC-BY-4.0, resized.

Field Yates and Mel Kiper spent Wednesday’s episode of their First Draft show sorting the 2027 class by position. Their verdict: quarterback, wide receiver, edge rusher, tight end, safety and defensive tackle are stacked, while interior offensive line, running back and offensive tackle are the thin spots.

Yates named Oklahoma State’s Drew Mestemaker and Notre Dame’s CJ Carr as his first quarterback tier, ahead of a second tier of Ole Miss’ Trinidad Chambliss, Miami’s Darian Mensah, Texas’ Arch Manning and Oregon’s Dante Moore. Their third tier is USC’s Jayden Maiava and South Carolina’s LaNorris Sellers, with North Texas’ Tayven Jackson and Northern Arizona’s Ty Pennington as Day 3 options.

Their position verdicts against the 15-board consensus

A consensus top 50 built from 15 public big boards and updated Tuesday shows how much of the class the boards put in the first-round conversation. The count below is how many of those 50 play each position, with the highest-ranked name at each one.

PositionYates and KiperNames they citedIn consensus top 50Highest-ranked
QuarterbackStackedMestemaker, Carr, Chambliss, Mensah, Manning, Moore8Dante Moore, 11th
Wide receiverStackedJeremiah Smith, Charlie Becker, Nick Marsh, Jackson Harris, Justin Bowick7Smith, 1st
Edge rusherStackedNot named in the recap6Colin Simmons, 3rd
Defensive lineDefensive tackle stackedNot named in the recap6Will Echoles, 12th
Tight endStackedNot named in the recap2Jamari Johnson, 14th
SafetyStackedNot named in the recap3KJ Bolden, 16th
Offensive tackleThin; no top-10 tackle unless Jordan Seaton finishes strong (Kiper)Seaton6Seaton, 5th
Interior offensive lineThinGreg Johnson, Minnesota, leads (Yates)2Johnson, 19th
Running backThin behind Jadan Baugh; Kewan Lacy and Ahmad Hardy are hurt (Kiper)Baugh, Lacy, Hardy3Baugh, 10th

The edge, defensive line, tight end and safety rows are the consensus counts only, since the recap does not name individual players there. Iowa’s Trevor Lauck, listed on that board as an offensive lineman, is counted with the tackles, as Kiper does on his own board.

The boards agree with the thin verdicts only loosely. Seaton is fifth on the consensus even though Kiper does not see a top-10 tackle, and Baugh is the lone running back in the top 10, with Lacy 30th and Hardy 40th. That is the shape Kiper described: one first-round back and a drop-off behind him.

Yates’ quarterback tiers against the numbers

The tiers do not line up with where the boards sort the quarterbacks. Mestemaker and Carr are Yates’ top tier, yet the consensus has Moore at 11th and Manning at 13th, ahead of Mestemaker at 15th. Moore, who has not played since September 26 and is expected to miss the rest of the season, is still 11th and in 10 of the 13 first-round mocks we counted.

QuarterbackYates’ tierConsensus rank (Nov. 3)Kiper’s board (Oct. 30)Our 13-mock count (Oct. 28-Nov. 1)
Drew Mestemaker115th2nd12 of 13, 7.8 average pick
CJ Carr123rd, up 8 spots10th8 of 13, 21.5 average
Darian Mensah222nd4th12 of 13, 9.9 average
Trinidad Chambliss231st7th12 of 13, 19.2 average
Arch Manning213th24th7 of 13, 25.4 average
Dante Moore211th25th10 of 13, 22.8 average

Kiper’s board is the most aligned with Yates: his top four quarterbacks are Mestemaker, Mensah, Chambliss and Carr, with Manning sixth among the passers. The consensus is the odd one out because it still gives Manning and Moore credit for their preseason status. We broke down Kiper’s full top 25 in our October 30 board post, and our 13-mock consensus has the average picks used above.

Yates also pushed back on the idea that the class is too quarterback-heavy at the top: “We’re not going to have six quarterbacks go in the top 12. I think there’s still a chance we could see four or five go in the first round, and a lot of good depth across the board in this entire class.” A first-round mock published the same day by the Best Pod Available hosts did exactly that, with five quarterbacks and five wide receivers off the board, Mestemaker third to Miami and Chambliss fourth to the Jets.

Wide receiver: the deepest group

Kiper said he could go 25 deep at receiver with players he and Yates feel strongly about. Smith leads it by a distance, and the next four they named are Becker and Marsh of Indiana, LSU’s Jackson Harris and Oklahoma State’s Justin Bowick. On the consensus board, Becker is seventh, Marsh 26th, and Rutgers’ KJ Duff and Arizona State’s Reed Harris are 39th and 36th.

BrainyBallers on X

The week-10 receiver tracker above ranks Smith first in expected points added per play, at plus 0.96 over 87 plays, with Texas’ Cam Coleman second and Becker third. A separate tracker post from the same account puts Duff first in age-adjusted usage rate.

Running back and the Baugh question

Kiper called running back relatively weak behind a potential first-round pick in Florida’s Jadan Baugh, in part because Lacy of Ole Miss and Hardy of Missouri are injured. The consensus has Baugh 10th, Lacy slipping three spots to 30th and Hardy two to 40th. Our 13-mock count had Baugh in 12 first rounds at an average of 21.6, with a range from second to 32nd, so his floor is the real debate.

The next data point is the weekend, when Tennessee hosts Kentucky and the Gilliam and Heard matchup from our midseason risers post gets its test. For positions, the question for the boards is whether the thin groups get a late riser the way Gilliam and Heard did.

The why matters.

See something that needs a second look? Read our corrections policy.

Join the conversation

Use a name or stay anonymous. No account or email required. Comments are reviewed before appearing.

Up to 3,000 characters

No published comments yet. Start the conversation.