October 5 update: a fourth-game result, not new passing-depth data
Bryce Young completed 29 of 41 passes for 329 yards and two touchdowns without an interception in Carolina’s 32–26 win over Detroit on October 4. Tetairoa McMillan caught both touchdown passes.
That adds a productive fourth game to the season, but it does not update the earlier deep-attempt percentage or pressure rate discussed below. Those figures retain their original two-game and three-game windows; passing yards alone cannot establish whether Young attempted a greater share of deep throws against Detroit.
The picture through three games
Bryce Young threw for 291 yards and one touchdown in Carolina’s 21–18 loss at Cleveland on September 27. That took his season total to 939 passing yards and seven touchdown passes through three games. Strong individual yardage did not ensure that the offense scored enough to win.
The earlier two-game comparison remains useful if its dates stay attached: Young had 648 passing yards and six touchdowns after Week 2. His deep-attempt share, measuring throws of at least 20 air yards, was 15.1 percent in that window, compared with 7.1 percent in 2025.
Pressure is another part of the Week 4 question
Through three games, the recorded pressure figure was 43.5 percent of Young’s dropbacks, with seven sacks. He had also faced pressure more than half the time over the previous two weeks. Pressure rate and sacks measure different things: a pressured play can still end in a completed pass, an incompletion or a scramble rather than a sack.
The reported 11 completions of at least 25 yards through Week 3 describe the final gain on completed plays. They are not an updated version of the 20-air-yard deep-attempt percentage, which measures where throws travel before the catch. Combining those figures as though they were one statistic would hide that distinction.
The whynfl view
The share of deep attempts is more informative about offensive intent than a passing-yardage rank by itself. Yardage can change with game situation, the number of attempts and what receivers do after the catch. A change in where a quarterback sends the ball asks a different question: what opportunities is the offense trying to create? The two measures should be read together. More downfield attempts may create larger gains, but the decision is useful only when the coverage and protection support it. A small number of successful plays can move a two-game average dramatically. That is why the next test is repeatability, not whether the current rank sounds impressive. It is also useful to separate play-calling, the quarterback’s decision and the receiver’s finish rather than assigning every result to one person.
What to watch next
Track the same passing-depth measure over later games and retain its date range. Compare it with attempts, pressure and turnovers where verified data is available. If defenses remove deep opportunities, productive shorter decisions can still represent good quarterback play; a lower deep-pass share would not automatically mean regression.
What remains uncertain
The deep-attempt percentage above covers only the opening two games; the passing totals, long completions and 43.5 percent pressure rate cover three. WHYNFL has not independently charted each play, and neither sample establishes a season-long trend.
No published comments yet. Start the conversation.